CFP: Teaching Writing in a Time of Chaos

CFP: Teaching Writing in a Time of Chaos

Timeline:

Proposals due: January 5th, 2026

Acceptance announcement: January 15th, 2026

Online micro-symposium: April 23, 2026

9:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m. MST

Format: 10 minute presentations

Google form submission: https://forms.gle/TeNHGqfWJ7WbikZK9

Technology Writing and Culture website: https://techwritingculture.de/

As college writing teachers in the United States we occupy a period of instability and disruption that pervades our professional and personal lives. If there are boundaries between history, politics and the classroom, those boundaries seem to be very permeable, weak at best, and constantly shifting, leading at times to a sort of pedagogical dissociation, a sense of surrealness and at times despair. As Blitz and Hurlbert wrote over 25 years ago in the introduction to Letters for the Living: Teaching Writing in a Violent Age, writing teachers have often shared a familiar story:

We want to change the world

We are supposed to change the world

No one can change the world

It’s too hard to change the world

Education should change the world

The wrong people are changing the world

Given the turbulent state of the world, and the long history of resistance pedagogy, a cynical or depressed reader might conclude that teaching writing isn’t the most effective way to forestall creeping fascism–If your only tool is a syllabus, then every problem looks like a learning objective. Nevertheless there is value in asking, how should instructors respond to concentrated attacks on democracy, the defenestration of individual rights, the ongoing attempts to dismantle the Civil Rights Act under the guise of anti-DEI legislature, and the normalization of authoritarianism? Teaching writing as resistance becomes even more fraught as free speech comes under concerted attack in the classroom, as seen in bills in Florida, Utah and other states aggressively demonizing educators and censoring professors. How do we respond as writing teachers to political violence? While recognizing that individual efforts are not a singular solution to systemic problems, what pedagogical interventions can we employ?

Possible topics might include anything really cool that you are doing in your classroom that gives you a shred of hope. Or possibly addressing one of the following:

  • Making space for free speech in the classroom while remaining employed
  • Student motivation as a casualty of social upheaval
  • Responding to mental health issues among colleagues, staff and students
  • Finding joy in teaching writing in spite of “everything”
  • The classroom as a refuge from social turmoil
  • Alternatives to the industrial, neoliberal model of education
  • Effective responses to artificial intelligence abuse
  • Resisting the LMS surveillance model of education
  • Rediscovering pencil and paper
  • Student evaluations as surveillance and control
  • Protecting our most marginalized students
  • The promise and potential of unionization
  • Experimental pedagogy as a response to oppression and control
  • Small acts of kindness in the classroom
  • The laws of salvage: The ethics of pillaging the leftover snacks in the break room
  • What to do when a political murder happens on your campus
  • Course learning outcomes: are they the antichrist spoken of by ancient prophets?
  • Whatever happened to that idealistic inner grad student
  • Coping with burnout: learning to rekindle the love in your toxic relationship with academia
  • Meaningful teaching in the midst of chaos
  • The positionality of professional outrage
  • Dismantling the master’s house with the master’s tools: disruptive technologies to usher in the next utopia
  • Is early retirement the only answer?

Format: participants will be asked to present on Microsoft Teams for 10 minutes, so as to accommodate both the number of applicants and our damaged attention spans. Slides are encouraged but not mandatory. Accommodations will be made for presenters who need to share their work anonymously. Although there is some silliness in the CFP this is a real thing.

Timeline:

Proposals due: January 5th, 2026

Acceptance announcement: January 15th, 2026

Online micro-symposium: April 23, 2026

Google form submission: https://forms.gle/TeNHGqfWJ7WbikZK9

Technology Writing and Culture website: https://techwritingculture.de/